Industry Update: Review Key Contract Terms When Handling Unresponsive Solar Companies
June 15, 2026 No Comments
Read More » If you signed a solar contract in Arizona and the savings never showed up or your bills got worse, your panels stopped producing, or you were misled about what you were signing you are not alone. Arizona has one of the highest solar installation rates in the country, and along with that growth has come a steady stream of state and federal enforcement actions against solar companies for misleading sales practices.
Arizona homeowners have specific protections under state law that homeowners in many other states do not. Title 44 of the Arizona Revised Statutes spells out what a solar contract must contain, what warranties must be provided, and what conduct counts as consumer fraud. Where a solar company has not complied with those requirements, a qualified attorney may review
whether the contract may be voidable or whether other legal remedies may apply.
Solar Cancellation Resource Center collects and organizes information from Arizona homeowners and connects them with Consumer Advocacy Law Group, a law firm experienced in consumer protection matters. Submit your information for a free intake — there is no
obligation, and the intake itself does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Arizona Consumer Fraud Act is the state’s primary consumer protection statute. It prohibits deception, false promises, misrepresentation, and the concealment or omission of material facts in connection with the sale or advertisement of merchandise, including solar systems. The Arizona Attorney General’s Office has used this statute repeatedly against solar installers and lead generators — including a 2023 enforcement action against Vision Solar and Solar Xchange that resulted in a $13.8 million suspended civil penalty, and a 2025 consent agreement with Sunrun and Vivint Solar that produced $600,000 in consumer restitution payments to Arizona consumers.
A homeowner has the right to bring a private action under the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act within one year of the date the claim arises. Whether your situation may give rise to a claim under this statute is a question for a qualified attorney.
Arizona has a chapter of state law specifically dedicated to solar energy devices. The provisions most relevant to homeowners include:
• A.R.S. § 44-1762 (Warranties): The collectors, heat exchangers, and storage units of a solar energy device sold or installed in Arizona — and the installation itself — must be warranted for at least two years. Remaining components must be warranted for at least one year. The seller must provide a written statement of the warranty, responsibilities assumed or disclaimed, and performance data.
• A.R.S. § 44-1763 (Required Disclosures): Distributed energy generation system agreements — which include most residential solar leases, loans, and PPAs — must
contain specific disclosures. Where required disclosures were not made, an attorney may review whether that omission may be a potential issue.
• Licensing requirements: Solar installers in Arizona must hold the appropriate license issued by the Arizona Registrar of Contractors (ROC). Installation by an unlicensed contractor may give rise to a complaint and, in some cases, may be grounds an attorney could review.
Arizona, like federal law, provides a cancellation period for contracts signed at a homeowner’s residence. Under A.R.S. § 44-5002, any provision of a contract that attempts to waive the buyer’s right of cancellation is void and has no effect. If you signed your contract within the last three business days, you may still be inside the statutory cancellation window, and a qualified attorney can advise on how to exercise that right.
If the three-day window has passed, that does not necessarily end the analysis. Arizona’s Consumer Fraud Act and the solar-specific provisions of Title 44 may still apply depending on the facts.
Take this quiz to see if you're eligible for cancellation.
Arizona regulates residential solar more heavily than most states. Three bodies of law are most
relevant when a homeowner is reviewing whether a solar contract may be subject to legal
challenge.
The Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) is the state body with primary jurisdiction over electric utilities. The ACC sets the interconnection rules that govern how rooftop solar systems connect to utilities like Arizona Public Service (APS), Tucson Electric Power (TEP), and Salt River Project. Two ACC policy decisions have a direct impact on the savings homeowners actually receive from their solar systems:
After 2016, the ACC moved Arizona away from traditional one-to-one net metering. New residential solar customers now receive an Excess Generation Credit at a rate set per utility and reviewed periodically. This rate is generally lower than the retail rate of electricity, which directly affects the financial math a homeowner was sold.
APS, TEP, and SRP each have their own approved tariffs. A savings projection that ignored your specific utility’s structure may have been materially misleading. A qualified attorney may review whether such a projection may be grounds for a misrepresentation claim.
If your salesperson promised one-to-one net metering, told you your bill would go to zero, or showed you a savings calculation that did not reflect your actual utility’s Excess Generation Credit rate, that promise should be reviewed against what is in your written contract.
Every situation is fact-specific, but certain patterns appear repeatedly in Arizona consumer
complaints. A qualified attorney may review whether any of the following may apply to your
contract:
Promises that bills would go to zero, that solar payments would replace the utility bill entirely, that the system was “free,” or that the company was affiliated with APS, TEP, SRP, or a government program. The Arizona Attorney General’s 2023 action against Vision Solar specifically cited unsubstantiated savings claims and misrepresentations of utility affiliation.
Arizona PPA and lease contracts commonly include annual payment escalators (often 2.9% per year). When the escalator is not verbally explained at the point of sale and the homeowner only sees the all-in numbers years later, an attorney may review whether the omission may be a potential issue under A.R.S. § 44-1522.
Arizona’s Telephone Solicitations Act and Consumer Fraud Act both apply to high-pressure sales tactics. Homeowners pressured into signing on a tablet within minutes — without a chance to read the document — frequently report contracts that bear little resemblance to what was verbally promised.
Installation by a contractor not properly licensed by the Arizona Registrar of Contractors, or failure to provide the written warranty required by A.R.S. § 44-1762, may form the basis for an ROC complaint and, separately, an attorney’s review of contract enforceability.
Arizona-specific issues — dust accumulation reducing output, monsoon damage, inverter failures from extreme heat, undersized systems that cannot offset summer cooling loads — may, depending on the facts, support claims for non-performance or breach. An attorney may review whether documented performance shortfalls may support a remedy.
SCRC is a marketing and intake service. We are not a law firm, and we do not analyze, audit, or evaluate your contract. Our role is straightforward:
Through our intake form or by calling 602-975-2940. The intake is free.
You provide your solar contract,
finance documents, recent utility bills, and any sales materials or communications you still have. We collect and organize what you give us.
Your documentation may be reviewed by Consumer Advocacy Law Group, our law firm partner. Whether any legal review proceeds, and any outcome, is determined solely by the law firm.
If a legal review path is offered, you decide whether to engage.
The fixed-fee structure is explained up front before you commit to anything. Important: do not stop making payments on your solar contract or financing without first speaking with a qualified attorney. Stopping payments without legal guidance may result in late fees, damage to your credit, default, repossession, foreclosure proceedings, or other consequences.
Many Arizona homeowners discover, often only when trying to sell their home, that a UCC-1 financing statement has been filed in connection with their solar agreement. A UCC-1 is a financing statement filed against the solar equipment, not the home itself. However, a UCC-1 fixture filing may appear in a title search and can complicate or delay a home sale. If you are trying to sell a home with solar and have run into a UCC-1 issue, a qualified attorney may review the filing and advise whether the underlying contract may be subject to challenge or whether the filing may be addressed through a UCC-3 amendment or other process.
Below are representative experiences shared by Arizona homeowners who have submitted information to SCRC. All testimonials reflect individual experiences. Past results do not predict future outcomes.
“The pitch was free energy with government backing. After installation, my system barely offset summer peaks, and monsoon damage led to inverter failures. The installer ghosted me. SCRC was knowledgeable and empathetic, collected my information, and connected me with their law firm partner. The fixed fee was explained up front — no surprises.”
Whether a specific Arizona solar contract may be cancelled depends on the facts of your case and the terms of your agreement. Arizona law — including the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act and Title 44, Chapter 11 — provides several grounds that a qualified attorney may review. Submit your information for a free intake to find out if you may be eligible for a legal review.
Arizona provides a three-business-day cancellation period under A.R.S. § 44-5002 for contracts signed at your home, and any waiver of that right is void. If you signed within the last three business days, contact a qualified attorney immediately. Beyond that window, other Arizona
statutes — including the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act, which has a one-year private-action limitations period — may still apply depending on the facts.
The Arizona Consumer Fraud Act (A.R.S. § 44-1521 et seq.) applies broadly to deceptive practices in the sale or advertisement of merchandise, and the Arizona Attorney General has used it repeatedly against solar companies. Whether it applies to your specific contract is a question for a qualified attorney.
A UCC-1 is a financing statement filed against the solar equipment, not the home itself. It may, however, appear in a title search and complicate a home sale. A qualified attorney may review the filing and advise on options.
In most cases, the financial obligation does not automatically disappear when a solar company closes. The contract or financing may have been transferred to another party. A qualified attorney may review your documentation and advise on what may apply to your situation. SCRC has a separate page on solar company bankruptcies if that fits your situation.
The UCC-1 fixture filing typically associated with a solar lease is a lien on the solar equipment, not on the home itself. However, the filing can appear in title and lender searches and may affect a real estate transaction. A qualified attorney may review how the filing may apply to your specific situation.
The intake form itself takes approximately 60 seconds. Information collection typically takes one to two weeks, depending on how quickly the homeowner provides the requested documentation. Once SCRC has connected you with a qualified law firm, the timing of any review is determined by the attorney.
No — not without first speaking with a qualified attorney. Stopping payments may result in late fees, damage to your credit, default, repossession, foreclosure proceedings, or other consequences. Continue payments while your situation is evaluated.
It may matter. Arizona requires solar installers to be licensed by the Arizona Registrar of Contractors. Installation by an unlicensed contractor may give rise to an ROC complaint and may, separately, be a fact a qualified attorney would consider when reviewing contract
enforceability.
SCRC is a marketing and intake service. We collect and organize your information and connect you with Consumer Advocacy Law Group, our law firm partner. We are not a law firm, do not provide legal advice, and do not represent you. The intake is free, and submitting information does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The intake itself is free. If a legal review path is offered through our law firm partner, the engagement is on a fixed-fee basis — fully explained before you commit to anything. SCRC does not charge for the intake.
No outcome is guaranteed. SCRC does not promise that any solar contract will be cancelled, modified, or otherwise resolved, and does not promise eligibility for any specific remedy. Whether any monetary recovery may be available is a question for a qualified attorney based on the facts of your case.
Submit your information for a free intake. SCRC will collect your documentation and forward it to Consumer Advocacy Law Group, the qualified law firm we work with.